Guide
How to read a version comparison
Fixed failures, new regressions and behaviour changes, what each section means and which numbers to distrust.
A comparison view rewards a specific reading order. Headline score last, not first.
Start with new failures
Anything failing in the candidate that passed in the baseline is the reason this review exists. Read those first and in full.
Then fixed failures
Confirm they are fixed for the right reason. A case can pass because the agent now refuses the whole flow, which is not a fix.
Then behaviour changes
Escalation rate, tool usage mix and average turn count. These shift silently and show up in operational costs weeks later.
Headline score last
Use it as a summary you already understand, not as the thing that forms your opinion.
What to take from this
- New regressions before everything else.
- Check that fixes are real fixes.
- Behaviour drift has a cost even when tests pass.
Next guide
Tool validation patternsAssertions for call presence, ordering, arguments, idempotency and failure handling, with the trade-offs of each.